Comparisons of Myocardial Deformation Between Cases With Normal Coronary Arteries and Patients With Coronary Slow Flow

Document Type: Original Article

Authors

1 Echocardiography Research Center, Rajaie Cardiovascular, Medical, and Research Center, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, IR Iran.

2 Rajaie Cardiovascular, Medical, and Research Center, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, IR Iran.

3 Cardiovascular Intervention Research Center, Rajaie Cardiovascular, Medical, and Research Center, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, IR Iran.

4 Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care, Qom University of Medical Sciences, Qom, IR Iran.

5 Pain Research Center, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, IR Iran.

Abstract

Background: Slow coronary flow (SCF) is a condition defined as the delayed passage of the contrast agent in the absence of angiographic coronary artery stenosis. Left ventricular (LV) systolic and diastolic dysfunction has been reported in patients with SCF, which can influence their functional capacity. This study compared myocardial deformation between cases with normal coronary arteries and patients with SCF.
Methods: This cross-sectional comparative study included 32 patients with SCF and 32 controls with normal epicardial coronary arteries (NECA). After coronary angiography, echocardiography was done for all the participants and the results were compared between the groups.
Results: A total of 64 patients were studied. The mean global longitudinal peak systolic strain (GLPS.Avg) was 16.85. SCF was significantly more frequent in the men than in the women (P < 0.05). Diabetes mellitus, systemic hypertension, a history of past or current smoking, and a family history of coronary artery disease (CAD) in the patients with SCF and dyslipidemia in the NECA group were more frequent, although these differences were not statistically significant. GLPS.Avg and global longitudinal peak systolic stress in the apical 4-chamber view (GLPS.A4C) in the patients with SCF were significantly lower than those in the NECA group. Global strain in the apical 2- and 3-chamber views (GLPS.A2C and GLPS.LAX), septal E, septal A, lateral E, lateral A, and right ventricular Sm (peak myocardial systolic velocity) were also nonsignificantly lower in the patients with SCF.
Conclusions: Strain imaging using 2D echocardiography was abnormal in our patients with SCF, in comparison with the NECA group. These abnormalities may represent subtle systolic and/or diastolic dysfunction in patients suffering from SCF.

Keywords


1. Sanati H, Kiani R, Shakerian F, Firouzi A,
Zahedmehr A, Peighambari M, et al. Coronary
Slow Flow Phenomenon Clinical Findings and
Predictors. Res Cardiovasc Med. 2016 Jan
2;5(1):e30296.
2. Arbel Y, Rind E, Banai S, Halkin A, Berliner S,
Herz I, et al. Prevalence and predictors of slow
flow in angiographically normal coronary
arteries. Clin Hemorheol Microcirc.
2012;52(1):5-14.
3. Baykan M, Baykan EC, Turan S, Gedikli O,
Kaplan S, Kiriş A, et al. Assessment of left
ventricular function and Tei index by tissue
Doppler imaging in patients with slow coronary
flow. Echocardiography. 2009
Nov;26(10):1167-72.
4. Li Y, Wang Y, Jia D, Lv Y, Zhang Y, Guan Z,
et al. Assessment of risk factors and left
ventricular function in patients with slow
coronary flow. Heart Vessels. Heart Vessels.
2016 Mar;31(3):288-97.
5. Balci MM, Arslan U, Kocaoğlu I, Kafes H,
Balci KG, Kisacik HL. Right ventricular
functions in patients with slow coronary flow.
Acta Cardiol. 2013 Apr;68(2):161-6.
6. Altunkas F, Koc F, Ceyhan K, Celik A, Kadi H,
Karayakali M, Ozbek K, Burucu T, Ozturk A,
Onalan O. The effect of slow coronary flow on
right and left ventricular performance. Med
Princ Pract. 2014;23(1):34-9.
7. Elsherbiny IA. Left ventricular function and
exercise capacity in patients with slow coronary
flow. Echocardiography. 2012 Feb;29(2):158-
64.
8. Gunes Y, Tuncer M, Guntekin U, Ceylan Y,
Sahin M, Simsek H. Regional functions of the
left ventricle in patients with coronary slow flow
and the effects of nebivolol. Ther Adv
Cardiovasc Dis. 2009 Dec;3(6):441-6.
9. Nurkalem Z, Gorgulu S, Uslu N, Orhan AL,
Alper AT, Erer B, Zencirci E, Aksu H, Eren M.
Longitudinal left ventricular systolic function is
impaired in patients with coronary slow flow.
Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2009 Jan;25(1):25-32.
10. Sezgin AT, Topal E, Barutcu I, Ozdemir R,
Gullu H, Bariskaner E, Ermis N, Tandogan I,
Acikgoz N, Sivri N. Impaired left ventricle
filling in slow coronary flow phenomenon: an echo-Doppler study. Angiology. 2005;
56(4):397-401.
11. Zencir C, Cetin M, Güngör H, Karaman K,
Akgüllü C, Eryılmaz U, et al. Evaluation of left
ventricular systolic and diastolic functions in
patients with coronary slow flow phenomenon.
Turk Kardiyol Dern Ars. 2013 Dec;41(8):691-6.
12. Azarfarin, R., Sheikhzadeh, D., Mirinazhad, M.,
Bilehjani, E., Alizadehasl, Azin. Do nondiabetic
patients undergoing coronary artery bypass
grafting surgery require intraoperative
management of hyperglycemia?
13. Acta Anaesthesiol Taiwan. 2011 Jun;49(2):41-5.
doi: 10.1016/j.aat.2011.05.009. Epub 2011 Jun
24.
14. Hawkins BM, Stavrakis S, Rousan TA, AbuFadel M, Schechter E. Coronary slow flow--
prevalence and clinical correlations. Circ J.
2012;76(4):936-42.
15. Yilmaz H, Demir I, Uyar Z. Clinical and
coronary angiographic characteristics of patients
with coronary slow flow. Acta Cardiol. 2008
Oct;63(5):579-84.
16. Dai YX, Li CG, Huang ZY, Zhong X, Qian JY,
Liu XB, et al. Clinical and angiographic
characteristics of patients with slow coronary
flow. Zhonghua Xin Xue Guan Bing Za Zhi.
2011 Jul;39(7):642-6.
17. Aksakal E, Islamoğlu Y, Simşek Z, Elbey MA,
Sevimli S, Arslan S, et al. The association of
coronary slow flow with time to peak systolic
strain. Turk Kardiyol Dern Ars. 2011
Jan;39(1):29-34.
18. Shirani S, Darabian S, Jozaghi S, Hamidian R.
Correlation between endothelial dysfunction in
normal coronary patients with slow flow and
aortic ectasia: the first report. Cardiol J.
2009;16(2):146-50.
19. Fineschi M, Bravi A, Gori T. The "slow
coronary flow" phenomenon: evidence of
preserved coronary flow reserve despite
increased resting microvascular resistances. Int J
Cardiol. 2008 Jul 21;127(3):358-61.
20. Yaghoubi, A., Safaie, N., Azarfarin, R.,
Alizadehasl, Azin., Golzari, S.E. valuation of
cardiovascular diseases and their risk factors in
hospitalized patients in East Azerbaijan
province, Northwest Iran: A review of 18323
cases . Journal of Tehran University Heart
Center, 2013, 8(2):101-105
21. Mirinejad, M., Azarfarin, R., Azin Alizadehasl.
Cisatracurium in cardiac surgery - Continuous
infusion vs. bolus administration; Middle East
Journal of Anesthesiology; 2007, 19(3):563-
572.
22. Erdogan D, Caliskan M, Gullu H, Sezgin AT,
Yildirir A, Muderrisoglu H. Coronary flow
reserve is impaired in patients with slow
coronary flow. Atherosclerosis. 2007
Mar;191(1):168-74.
23. Parisi V, Galasso G, Pastore F, De Luca S,
Allocca E, Capuano E, et al. Three dimensional
myocardial deformation and diagnosis of stable
coronary artery disease. Transl Med UniSa.
2014 Dec 19;11:69-71.
24. Sadeghpour A, Pouraliakbar H, Azarfarin R,
Zavareian S, Amirahmadi A. Mid-term patency
in radial artery and saphenous vein after
coronary artery bypass grafting in asymptomatic
patients using 128-slice CT coronary
angiography. Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine
5(1),e23799.
25. Dehaki M, Tabaee A, Ahmadabadi C, Ghavidel
A, Omrani G. Pulmonary artery banding in the
current era: Is it still useful? Annals of Pediatric
Cardiology 5(1), pp. 36-39.