Resting-State Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Perfusion Imaging Accuracy in Diagnosing Patients With Coronary Artery Disease: A Comparison with Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 Department of Radiology, Rajaie Cardiovascular and Medical Research Center, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, IR Iran.

2 Department of Interventional Cardiology, Rajaie Cardiovascular Medical and Research Center, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, IR Iran.

3 Rajaie Cardiovascular Medical and Research Center, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, IR Iran.

4 Advanced Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology Research Center, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, IR Iran.

5 Department of Radiology, Amiralam Hospital, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, IR Iran.

Abstract

Background: Myocardial ischemia may occur as a result of a variety of vascular and congenital conditions. There are different methods to assess ischemic myocardial tissue
This study aimed to assess the diagnostic accuracy of cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMR) in advanced coronary artery disease (CAD).
 
Methods: Thirty patients with a predefined history of severe CAD underwent CMR with a 1.5 T CMR machine. The imaging protocol consisted of 4 steps: left ventricular functional imaging, T1-weighted contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance perfusion imaging, early gadolinium enhancement, and delayed gadolinium enhancement. The left ventricular functional indices and time-intensity curves (TICs) of the magnetic resonance perfusion imaging were calculated using a CMR analysis software tool. The TICs were drawn on 90 normal, early, and delayed gadolinium-enhanced territories under the guidance of percutaneous coronary angiography reports.
 
Results: Overall, 90 territories were derived from the 30 patients. Fifty-two territories were diagnosed with significant CAD and 38 with a normal coronary status. Our analysis revealed 35 regions with flattened TICs (increased time to peak, deceased maximum intensity, and more time-lasting plateaus) and 17 with normal patterns in diseased territories. From the total 38 angiographically normal regions, 36 regions presented normal TICs and 2 showed diseased patterns. The diagnostic accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of CMR were 78.8%, 67.3%, 94.7%, 94.59%, and 67.92%, respectively, in comparison with percutaneous coronary angiography.
 
Conclusions: Resting-state CMR can be used to detect the presence of any severe/significant coronary artery lesion with an acceptable accuracy. (Iranian Heart Journal 2021; 22(1): 84-90)

Keywords

References

  1. Patel, D. J., et al. Pathophysiology of transient myocardial ischemia in acute coronary syndromes. Characterization by continuous ST-segment monitoring. Circulation 1997;95: 1185-92.
  2. Zhao, X. B., et al., Impact of Myocardial Bridge-mural Coronary Artery on Myocardial Blood Supply Zhongguo Yi Xue Ke Xue Yuan Xue Bao, 2016;38:654-659.
  3. Cohn, P.F., K.M. Fox, and C. Daly, et al. Silent Myocardial Ischemia. Circulation 2003;108:1263-1277.
  4. Richard Conti,  et al. The stunned and hibernating myocardium: A brief review. Clinical Cardiology 1991; 14:708-712.
  5. Shan, K. et al. Role of Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging in the Assessment of Myocardial Viability. Circulation 2004; 109:1328-1334.
  6. Sawyer, D.B. and J. Loscalzo et al. Myocardial hibernation: restorative or preterminal sleep? Circulation 2002; 105:1517-9.
  7. Camici, P.G., S.K. Prasad, and O.E. Rimoldi et al. Stunning, Hibernation, and Assessment of Myocardial Viability. Circulation 2008. 117(1):103-114.
  8. Noninvasive Imaging of Myocardial Ischemia. Radiology 2007; 244:706-706.
  9. Pozo, E, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of coronary ct for the quantification of the syntax score in patients with left main and/or 3-vessel coronary disease. Comparison with invasive angiography. Int J Cardiol 2015; 182:549-56.
  10. Einstein, A.J., et al. Radiation Dose to Patients From Cardiac Diagnostic Imaging. Circulation 2007; 116:1290-1305.
  11. Mahrholdt, H., I. Klem, and U. Sechtem et al. Cardiovascular MRI for detection of myocardial viability and ischaemia. Heart 2007; 93:122-129.
  12. Burrell, S. and A. MacDonald et al. Artifacts and Pitfalls in Myocardial Perfusion Imaging. Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology 2006; 34:193-211.
  13. Beleslin, B.D., et al. Stress echocardiography in the detection of myocardial ischemia. Head-to-head comparison of exercise, dobutamine, and dipyridamole tests. Circulation 1994; 90:1168-1176.
  14. Picano, E et al. Grading of Ischemic Response in Stress Echocardiography, in Stress Echocardiography. 1994; Springer Berlin Heidelberg Berlin, Heidelberg. :98-109.
  15. Reeder, S.B., et al. Advanced Cardiac MR Imaging of Ischemic Heart Disease. RadioGraphics 2001; 21:1047-1074.
Iranian Heart Journal
Volume 22, Issue 1
Winter 2021
Pages 84-90

Files

Share

How to cite

Statistics