Reevaluation of Computed Tomography-Based Attenuation Correction on Myocardial Perfusion Imaging Compared With Coronary Angiography Findings

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 Cardiovascular Intervention Research Center, Rajaie Cardiovascular Medical and Research Center, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, IR Iran.

2 Department of Nuclear Medicine, School of Medicine, Iran University of Medical Science, Tehran, IR Iran.

3 Rajaie Cardiovascular Medical and Research Center, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, IR Iran.

4 Department of Nuclear Medicine, School of Medicine, Hasheminejad Hospital, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, IR Iran.

Abstract

Background: Noninvasive diagnostic methods for coronary artery disease (CAD) are a health priority. Coronary angiography (CA) is currently the gold-standard method for diagnosing CAD. Myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI) is used to diagnose CAD as well. This study aimed to reevaluate the effects of computed tomography (CT)-based attenuation correction on MPI results compared with CA findings.
 
Methods: This cross-sectional study enrolled 293 patients referred to Rajaie Cardiovascular Medical and Research Center. The study population underwent MPI with CT-based attenuation correction and CA to diagnose CAD within 3 months.
 
Results: In the right coronary artery (RCA) territory, CT-based attenuation correction led to a significant decrease in MPI sensitivity in men and an increase in specificity in all the patients except those with a normal body mass index. In the left circumflex coronary artery (LCX) territory, a significant reduction in sensitivity was noted just in overweight patients, while specificity improved merely in men. In the left anterior descending artery (LAD) territory, none of the diagnostic parameters changed significantly with attenuation correction.
 
Conclusions: Performing CT-based attenuation correction significantly enhanced diagnostic specificity and worsened sensitivity in the RCA and LCX territories. The advantage of CT-based attenuation correction is more pronounced in patients with a normal body mass index and women. (Iranian Heart Journal 2023; 24(3): 15-23)

Keywords

References

  1. Wilson PW, D’Agostino RB, Levy D, Belanger AM, Silbershatz H, Kannel WB. Prediction of coronary heart disease using risk factor categories. Circulation. 1998; 97(18):1837-47.
  2. Ali MK, Jaacks LM, Kowalski AJ, Siegel KR, Ezzati M. Noncommunicable diseases: three decades of global data show a mixture of increases and decreases in mortality rates. Health affairs. 2015; 34(9):1444-55.
  3. Bhatnagar P, Wickramasinghe K, Williams J, Rayner M, Townsend N. The epidemiology of cardiovascular disease in the UK 2014. Heart. 2015; 101(15):1182-9.
  4. Perk J, De Backer G, Gohlke H, Graham I, Reiner Z, Verschuren W, et al. The Fifth Joint Task Force of the European Society of Cardiology and Other Societies on Cardiovascular Disease Prevention in Clinical Practice (constituted by representatives of nine societies and by invited experts) Developed with the special contribution of the European Association for Cardiovascular Prevention & Rehabilitation (EACPR)(vol 33, pg 1635, 2012). European Heart Journal. 2012; 33(17):2126-.
  5. Karimi-Moonaghi H, Mojalli M, Khosravan S. Psychosocial complications of coronary artery disease. Iranian Red Crescent medical journal. 2014; 16(6):e18162.
  6. Talaei M, Sarrafzadegan N, Sadeghi M, Oveisgharan S, Marshall T, Thomas GN, et al. Incidence of cardiovascular diseases in an Iranian population: the Isfahan Cohort Study. Archives of Iranian medicine. 2013; 16(3):0-.
  7. George RT, Arbab-Zadeh A, Miller JM, Kitagawa K, Chang H-J, Bluemke DA, et al. Adenosine stress 64-and 256-row detector computed tomography angiography and perfusion imaging: a pilot study evaluating the transmural extent of perfusion abnormalities to predict atherosclerosis causing myocardial ischemia. Circulation: Cardiovascular Imaging. 2009; 2(3):174-82.
  8. Schuijf JD, van Werkhoven JM, Pundziute G, Jukema JW, Decramer I, Stokkel MP, et al. Invasive versus noninvasive evaluation of coronary artery disease. JACC: Cardiovascular Imaging. 2008; 1(2):190-9.
  9. Members C, Klocke FJ, Baird MG, Lorell BH, Bateman TM, Messer JV, et al. ACC/AHA/ASNC guidelines for the clinical use of cardiac radionuclide imaging—executive summary: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (ACC/AHA/ASNC Committee to Revise the 1995 Guidelines for the Clinical Use of Cardiac Radionuclide Imaging). Journal of the American College of Cardiology. 2003; 42(7):1318-33.
  10. Zaret BL, Wackers FJ. Nuclear cardiology (1). The New England journal of medicine. 1993; 329(11):775-83.
  11. Hendel RC, Berman DS, Cullom SJ, Follansbee W, Heller GV, Kiat H, et al. Multicenter clinical trial to evaluate the efficacy of correction for photon attenuation and scatter in SPECT myocardial perfusion imaging. Circulation. 1999; 99(21):2742-9.
  12. Kong E, Cho I. Clinical issues regarding misclassification by Dixon based PET/MR attenuation correction. Hellenic journal of nuclear medicine. 2015; 18(1):42-7.
  13. DePuey EG, Garcia EV. Optimal specificity of thallium-201 SPECT through recognition of imaging artifacts. Journal of Nuclear Medicine. 1989; 30(4):441-9.
  14. Goetze S, Wahl RL. Prevalence of misregistration between SPECT and CT for attenuation-corrected myocardial perfusion SPECT. Journal of nuclear cardiology. 2007; 14(2):200-6.
  15. Neglia D, Rovai D, Caselli C, Pietila M, Teresinska A, Aguadé-Bruix S, et al. Detection of significant coronary artery disease by noninvasive anatomical and functional imaging. Circulation Cardiovascular imaging. 2015; 8(3).
  16. Xin WC, Shao XL, Wang YT, Wang JF, Wang XS, Yang L, et al. Is there an incremental value to use myocardial perfusion imaging with or without CT attenuation for the diagnosis of coronary artery disease? A study in Chinese patients. Hell J Nucl Med. 2018; 21:48-54.
  17. Raza H, Jadoon LK, Mushtaq S, Jabeen A, Maqbool M, Ain MU, et al. Comparison of non-attenuation corrected and attenuation corrected myocardial perfusion SPECT. The Egyptian Journal of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine. 2016; 47(3):783-92.
  18. Sharma P, Patel CD, Karunanithi S, Maharjan S, Malhotra A. Comparative accuracy of CT attenuation-corrected and non–attenuation-corrected SPECT myocardial perfusion imaging. Clinical nuclear medicine. 2012; 37(4):332-8.
  19. Huang R, Li F, Zhao Z, Liu B, Ou X, Tian R, et al. Hybrid SPECT/CT for attenuation correction of stress myocardial perfusion imaging. Clinical nuclear medicine. 2011; 36(5):344-9.
  20. Tonge CM, Manoharan M, Lawson RS, Shields RA, Prescott MC. Attenuation correction of myocardial SPECT studies using low resolution computed tomography images. Nuclear medicine communications. 2005; 26(3):231-7.
Iranian Heart Journal
Volume 24, Issue 3
July 2023
Pages 15-23

Files

Share

How to cite

Statistics