Iranian Heart Journal

Iranian Heart Journal

Impact of Clinical and Angiographic Criteria on Procedural Outcomes and Target Lesion Revascularization After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for Chronic Total Occlusion

Document Type : Original Article

Authors
1 Department of Cardiology, Faculty of Medicine, Beni-Suef University, Egypt.
2 Department of Cardiology, Beni-Suef Health Insurance Hospital, Egypt.
Abstract
Background: Coronary chronic total occlusion (CTO) recanalization aims to improve myocardial perfusion in the corresponding ischemic territory. Successful CTO percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) improves quality of life and left ventricular function.
Objectives: To investigate preprocedural predictors of successful antegrade CTO recanalization in two centers with limited resources and to evaluate procedural and midterm clinical outcomes after successful CTO recanalization.
 
Methods: This prospective study included 70 patients recruited from 2 centers with limited CTO PCI resources. The primary outcomes were procedural success rate, target lesion revascularization (TLR) at 1 year, and midterm success rate according to J-CTO scores. The secondary outcomes were major adverse cardiac events.
 
Results: J-CTO score variables were significant in predicting procedural success. A cutoff score of ≥2 was associated with procedural failure, with 100% sensitivity and 91% specificity, and may be used as a negative predictive factor when treating CTO lesions. A significant association was observed between the need for TLR, the presence of diabetes, and vessel angulation.
 
Conclusions: In resource-limited centers, use of an antegrade approach in patients with CTO lesions and lower J-CTO scores is expected to achieve higher midterm success rates compared with patients with higher J-CTO scores. (Iranian Heart Journal 2025; 26(4): 69-84)
Keywords

  1. Di Mario C, Barlis P, Tanigawa T, et al. Retrograde approach to coronary chronic total occlusions: preliminary single European centre experience. EuroIntervention. 2007; 3(2):181-187.
  2. Sianos G, Werner GS, Galassi AR, et al. Euro CTO Club. Recanalization of chronic total coronary occlusions: 2012 consensus document from the EuroCTO club. EuroIntervention. 2012; 8(2):139-145.
  3. Råmunddal T, Hoebers LP, Henriques JPS, et al. Chronic total occlusions in Sweden--a report from the Swedish Coronary Angiography and Angioplasty Registry. Heart. 2014; 100(22):1741-1747.
  4. Tomasello SD, Boukhris M, Giubilato S, et al. Management strategies in patients affected by chronic total occlusions: results from the Italian Registry of Chronic Total Occlusions. Eur Heart J. 2015; 36(5):3189-3198.
  5. Azzalini L, Jolicoeur EM, Pighi L, et al. Epidemiology, management strategies, and outcomes of patients with chronic total coronary occlusion. Am J Cardiol. 2016; 118(8):1128-1135.
  6. Jeroudi OM, Alomar ME, Michael TL, et al. Prevalence and management of coronary chronic total occlusions in a tertiary Veterans Affairs hospital. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2014; 84(5):637-643.
  7. Fefer P, Knudtson ML, Cheema AN, et al. Current perspectives on coronary chronic total occlusions: the Canadian Multicenter Chronic Total Occlusions Registry. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2012; 59(11):991-997.
  8. Sachdeva R, Agrawal N, Flynn S, et al. The myocardium supplied by a chronic total occlusion is a persistently ischemic zone. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2014; 83(1):9-16.
  9. Galassi AR, Tomasello SD, Crea F, et al. Transient impairment of vasomotion function after successful chronic total occlusion recanalization. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2012; 59(8):711-718.
  10. Werner GS, Surber R, Kuethe F, et al. Collaterals and the recovery of left ventricular function after recanalization of a chronic total coronary occlusion. Am Heart J. 2005; 149(1):129-137.
  11. Jang JS, Yang TH, Choi YJ, et al. Long-term survival benefit of revascularization compared with medical therapy in patients with coronary chronic total occlusion and well-developed collateral circulation. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2015; 8(3):271-279.
  12. Werner GS, Surber R, Ferrari M, et al. The functional reserve of collaterals supplying long-term chronic total coronary occlusions in patients without prior myocardial infarction. Eur Heart J. 2006; 27(20):2406-2412.
  13. Sachdeva R, Werner GS, Uretsky BF, et al. Reversal of ischemia of donor artery myocardium after recanalization of a chronic total occlusion. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2013; 82(6):E453-E458.
  14. Azzalini L, Dens J, Agostoni P, et al. Improve management, referral, and outcomes in patients with chronic total occlusion of an epicardial coronary artery. Am J Cardiol. 2015; 116(11):1774-1780.
  15. Safley DM, Koshy J, Grantham JA, et al. Changes in myocardial ischemic burden following percutaneous coronary intervention of chronic total occlusions. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2011; 78(3):337-343.
  16. Rossello X, Pujadas S, Serra V, et al. Assessment of inducible myocardial ischemia, quality of life, and functional status after successful percutaneous revascularization in patients with chronic total coronary occlusion. Am J Cardiol. 2015; 117(5):720-726.
  17. Safley DM, Grantham JA, Hatch R, et al. Quality of life benefits of percutaneous coronary intervention for chronic occlusions. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2014; 84(5):629-634.
  18. Nakamura M, Colombo A, Carlino M, et al. Percutaneous revascularization of chronic total occlusions: rationale, indications, techniques, and the cardiac surgeon’s point of view. Int J Cardiol. 2017; 231:90-96.
  19. Azzalini L, Candilio L, Ojeda S, et al. Impact of incomplete revascularization on long-term outcomes following chronic total occlusion percutaneous coronary intervention. Am J Cardiol. 2018; 121(9):1138-1148.
  20. Harding SA, Wu WC, Lo S, et al. A new algorithm for crossing chronic total occlusions from the Asia Pacific Chronic Total Occlusion Club. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2017; 10(21):2135-2143.
  21. Safley DM, Koshy J, Grantham JA, et al. Changes in myocardial ischemic burden following percutaneous coronary intervention of chronic total occlusions. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2011; 78(3):337-343.
  22. Hiroyuki S, Yoshihiro K, Mitsuru H. Impact of J-CTO score on procedural outcome and target lesion revascularization after percutaneous coronary intervention for chronic total occlusion: a substudy of the J-CTO Registry. EuroIntervention. 2016; 11(9):981-988.
  23. Cutlip DE, Windecker S, Mehran R, et al. Clinical end points in coronary stent trials: a case for standardized definitions. Circulation. 2007; 115(17):2344-2351.
  24. Lang RM, Badano LP, Mor-Avi V, et al. Recommendations for cardiac chamber quantification by echocardiography in adults: an update from the American Society of Echocardiography and the European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2015; 28(1):1-31.
  25. Connolly HM, Oh JK. Echocardiography. In: Bonow RO, Mann DL, Zipes DP, Libby P, Braunwald E, eds. Braunwald's Heart Disease: A Textbook for Cardiovascular Medicine. 9th ed. Philadelphia, PA: Elsevier Inc; 2012:200-276.
  26. Michael W, David P, Michelle A, et al. American Society of Echocardiography recommendations for quality echocardiography. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2011; 24(1):1-19.
  27. Technetium-99m-Sestamibi: another window on myocardial viability. J Nucl Med. 1991; 32(2):172-174.
  28. Galassi AR, Brilakis ES, Boukhris M, et al. Appropriateness of percutaneous revascularization of coronary chronic total occlusions: an overview. Eur Heart J. 2016; 37(34):2692-2700.
  29. Cosmo G, Mauro R, Colombo A. Crossing CTOs—The tips, tricks, and specialist kit that can mean the difference between success and failure. Cardiovasc Interv. 2009; 8(12):1019-104.
  30. Yoshihiro K, Mitsuru H, Takeshi I. The J-CTO score as a difficulty grading and time assessment tool. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2011; 4(2):213-221.
  31. Han J, Wang J, Jing Z, et al. Percutaneous coronary intervention for chronic total occlusion in 1263 patients: a single-center report. Chin Med J (Engl). 2006; 119(12):1165-1170.
  32. Pershad A, Gulati R, Karmpaliotis D, et al. A sex stratified outcome analysis from the OPEN-CTO registry. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2019; 93(6):1041-1047.
  33. Maiello L, Colombo A, Gianrossi R, et al. Coronary angioplasty of chronic occlusions: factors predictive of procedural success. Am Heart J. 1992; 124(3):581-584.
  34. Mitsudo T, Yamashita M, Asakura S, et al. Recanalization strategy for chronic total occlusions with tapered and stiff-tip guidewire: the results of CTO new technique for the Standard procedure (CONQUEST) trial. J Invasive Cardiol. 2008; 20(11):571-577.
  35. Yamane M, Muto T, Matsubara T, et al. Contemporary retrograde approach for the recanalization of coronary chronic total occlusion: on behalf of the Japanese Retrograde Summit Group. EuroIntervention. 2013; 9(1):102-109.
  36. Ellis SG, Ajluni S, Arnold AZ, et al. Increased coronary perforation in the new device era. Incidence, classification, management, and outcome. Circulation. 1994; 90(6):2725-2730.
  37. Galassi AR, Boukhris M, Toma R, et al. Percutaneous coronary intervention of chronic total occlusions in patients with low left ventricular ejection fraction. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2017; 10(21):2158-2170.
  38. Elias MD, Van Dongen J, Loes AL, et al. Improved recovery of regional left ventricular function after PCI of chronic total occlusion in STEMI patients: a cardiovascular magnetic resonance study of the randomized controlled EXPLORE trial. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2017; 19:53.
  39. Mitsuru H, Takeshi I, Yoshihiro K. Association between J-CTO score and long-term target lesion revascularization rate after successful chronic total coronary occlusion angioplasty: from the J-CTO Registry. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2019; 93(7):1025-1032.
  40. Mashaly A, Rha SW, Seung-Woon P, et al. Impact of diabetes mellitus on 5-year clinical outcomes in patients with chronic total occlusion lesions. Coron Artery Dis. 2018; 29(2):119-126.